To be fair, the guy on the receiving end of these legislative punches did approach Labour MP Mike Amesbury on […]

“This case is bananas,” opined the reader who sent it to me, and she was not wrong. In this case

Finnbogason v. Norseman is a pretty straightforward opinion addressing matrimonal property and spousal support, until you get to the part

Wow, there’s way more going on in this story than I expected, I guess partly because I have yet to

beardedmrbean:

largishcat: finally a fully inclusive list

soupdots: no you dont understand. i thought about doing that task . and also how i would do it. no

grox: Garlic powder & onion powder are literally like two beautiful twin sisters brushing eachothers long hair at the lake

lethalwizard: lethalwizard: hate being australian on the internet americans will be like “happy wet fuck wednesday!!” and i will look

sleepbby: me as a mother: girl what he do

estoult: toskarin: nobody wears a flat ass as confidently as ishtar and you know it